3 research outputs found

    Improved guarantees for the a priori TSP

    Full text link
    We revisit the a priori TSP (with independent activation) and prove stronger approximation guarantees than were previously known. In the a priori TSP, we are given a metric space (V,c)(V,c) and an activation probability p(v)p(v) for each customer v∈Vv\in V. We ask for a TSP tour TT for VV that minimizes the expected length after cutting TT short by skipping the inactive customers. All known approximation algorithms select a nonempty subset SS of the customers and construct a master route solution, consisting of a TSP tour for SS and two edges connecting every customer v∈Vβˆ–Sv\in V\setminus S to a nearest customer in SS. We address the following questions. If we randomly sample the subset SS, what should be the sampling probabilities? How much worse than the optimum can the best master route solution be? The answers to these questions (we provide almost matching lower and upper bounds) lead to improved approximation guarantees: less than 3.1 with randomized sampling, and less than 5.9 with a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm.Comment: 39 pages, 6 figures, extended abstract to appear in the proceedings of ISAAC 202

    Improving the approximation ratio for capacitated vehicle routing

    No full text
    We devise a new approximation algorithm for capacitated vehicle routing. Our algorithm yields a better approximation ratio for general capacitated vehicle routing as well as for the unit-demand case and the splittable variant. Our results hold in arbitrary metric spaces. This is the first improvement upon the classical tour partitioning algorithm by Haimovich and Rinnooy Kan (Math Oper Res 10:527-542, 1985) and Altinkemer and Gavish (Oper Res Lett 6:149-158, 1987).ISSN:0025-5610ISSN:1436-464
    corecore